This Indian sage, perhaps more than any other who has ever lived, provided a meeting-ground for all extremes of persuasion—gnostics and agnosticism, belief and the skepticism of caution, appreciation of intuition, and devotion to logic. While the world of the mind is still quivering from abrupt change—transition from too much other worldly religion to too much physical science—a man who recognized, as parts of a larger whole, the valid emphases of each, is a man whose thoughts are worth knowing today. In the Dhammapada, while Buddha both affirms and denies some things with assurance, many verses also contain, in sequence, the converse of what is first said. We find, therefore, that the sharp delineations.
'After the Flight 93 Election' by Michael Anton
Michael Anton - Wikipedia
Forgot your password? Don't have an account? Sign up here. Already have an account? Log in here.
How Michael Anton’s ‘Flight 93 Election’ Essay Defined the Trump Era
American Airlines Flight was a regularly scheduled international passenger flight from John F. All people aboard the plane passengers and 9 crew members were killed, along with five people on the ground. The location of the accident, and the fact that it took place two months and one day after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center in nearby Manhattan , initially spawned fears of another terrorist attack, but the National Transportation Safety Board NTSB attributed the disaster to the first officer's overuse of rudder controls in response to wake turbulence from a preceding Japan Airlines Boeing that took off minutes before it. According to the NTSB, the aggressive use of the rudder controls by the first officer stressed the vertical stabilizer until it snapped off the aircraft.
So far as they are concerned, however, the primary political branch of government, to which they must address their petitions, is the Supreme Court. The latest broadside against originalism from the right urges us to embrace this idea of judges as moral arbiters. The great crisis of the regime demands moral statesmanship from the bench. On such a moral basis, it is suggested, judges may establish rights not specifically mentioned in the constitution and empower Congress to legislate on matters not specifically authorized.