This ruling focused on a conservative corporation called Citizens United. They were releasing a documentary entitled Hillary: The Movie which negatively portrayed Hillary Clinton. The day limitation was put in place to prevent voters from being easily swayed to vote for a certain candidate with a flood of corporate donations. However, due to this case flag burning has been protected as freedom of speech since The actions occurred at the end of a political rally.
Citizens United V Fec
Essay on Fec vs. Citizens United - Words
Some of the conservatives' innovations were validate campaign finance laws. The "secondary effects" philosophy, for example, allows government to restrict speech if government can suggest a general, non-speech-related purpose, even if the real purpose is speech-related. The court ignored this philosophy in Citizens' United and other campaign finance cases—even though campaign finance reform is aimed not at speech itself, but at massive amounts of money that skew, corrupt, and undermine. We are here today to discuss the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
Citizens United vs. FEC
Federal Election Commission , a controversial decision that reversed century-old campaign finance restrictions and enabled corporations and other outside groups to spend unlimited funds on elections. While wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups have long had an outsized influence in elections, that sway has dramatically expanded since the Citizens United decision, with negative repercussions for American democracy and the fight against political corruption. A conservative nonprofit group called Citizens United challenged campaign finance rules after the FEC stopped it from promoting and airing a film criticizing presidential candidate Hillary Clinton too close to the presidential primaries. A majority of the Supreme Court sided with Citizens United, ruling that corporations and other outside groups can spend unlimited money on elections. The justices who voted with the majority assumed that independent spending cannot be corrupt and that the spending would be transparent, but both assumptions have proven to be incorrect.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document. Anticipating that it would make Hillary available on cable television through video-on-demand within 30 days of primary elections, Citizens United produced television ads to run on broadcast and cable television. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.